patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Will There Be Bargains at Fort Monmouth?

Local governments, schools and nonprofits stand to benefit from a new formula.

 

Everybody loves a discount, especially in a down real estate market, where locals are keeping a keen eye toward Fort Monmouth and it's wealth of possibilities, not just for business, but for education, government and the nonprofit sector.

Local officials will have one more chance to influence a formula for acquiring fort properties for public use when they meet next week with the head of the Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority (FMERA).

At FMERA's annual meeting this week the board attempted to pass a resolution that would change the way properties are transferred to public entities — like a former child development center that could go to the Tinton Falls school system — which would ultimately affect how these properties are priced.

Tinton Falls Mayor Michael Skudera asked that the mayors and the freeholder on the board have another month to examine the resolution, since the amount of money at stake with the weighting formula could be great.

Executive Director Bruce Steadman offered to host a working group with the mayors and the county about their concerns but it isn't clear yet if this meeting will result in further changes to the resolution. In the meantime the board withdrew the resolution.

Things to keep in mind

  • The Army continues to own all of Fort Monmouth.
  • Towns, the county and nonprofits put in Notices of Interest (NOI) about four years ago for specific properties that would make good public use.
  • The Army is requiring properties be sold for fair market value.
  • Redevelopers and local officials are pushing for discounts on individual properties because many require updating to meet local building codes and key infrastructures, like roads and utilities, need major upgrades.
  • Estimates for necessary redevelopment costs have been tagged at up to $100 million, which FMERA wants trimmed off property prices.
  • In the case of NOIs the Army agrees to take no money for their sales and FMERA would get the proceeds to reinvest in the property.

Recently the real estate committee, on which Oceanport Mayor Michael Mahon sits, tweaked the previous evaluation system for NOI's to make it better reflect the purposes of the public entities and non-profits making the applications.

The evaluation is based on a weighting system with seven categories

  • surrounding area (neighborhood) continuity
  • job creating use
  • services to municipality
  • regional fiscal impact
  • use enhances ability to attract jobs to adjacent tracts
  • public good, public safety or public education
  • reduces FMERA infrastructure or demolition costs

Mahon told Patch that the real estate committee reduced the weight of the jobs category, since non-profits and public entities by nature don't create a lot of jobs, and moved those points to public good. This reflects a give-and-take between the authority, whose mission it has said is, "jobs, jobs, jobs," and local officials who are concerned about quality of life and municipal needs.

Mayor Skudera, who is not part of that committee, called the weighting "arbitrary" and called for "a more quantitative approach."

Discounts and method of payment decided case by case

The resolution presented at the FMERA meeting calls for a discount of no more than 90 percent of the fair market value, so a property that is appraised at $1 million can be sold for as little as (but no less than) $10,000. The Army has agreed not to get paid on these properties. The proceeds of that sale will go to FMERA which will reinvest the money back into the footprint of the fort.

The buyer of a particular parcel can "pay" for the property in cash, in-kind services delivered over a 5-year term or through infrastructure improvements.

It was not discussed at the meeting, but it is possible to see how this might play out in NOI properties currently being considered. In the case of the possible county DPW station, it would be reasonable to assume that the county could provide in-kind services, like plowing and road maintenance to other fort properties.

According to FMERA, there are about 20 NOIs being considered. You can read more about the NOI process here.

NOIs and price of properties has been a hot topic surrounding the fort. There have been misconceptions about how much it would cost Brookdale to get Armstrong Hall, questions about whether Trinity Hall, a local private school start up, could snag a building, and controversy about how local governments can aquire prime space for their municipal needs.

The results of this resolution governing the weighting formula will first have an impact on the school Tinton Falls is requesting and the pool and teen center, which the county wants. Both are in Tinton Falls. The board will likely reintroduce and vote on the resolution at its Oct. 17 meeting, 7 p.m. at the Tinton Falls Municipal Center.

Related Topics: Eatontown property values, Fort Monmouth, Notice of Interest, Oceanport property value, and Tinton Falls property values

JosephGhabourLaw

10:18 am on Monday, September 24, 2012

The catch with these structures, is that they need a certificate of occupancy (CO) from the local town - Eatontown is the one I believe. The Department of Defense didn't build with any town, or state codes in mind, or in compliance.

"Redevelopers and local officials are pushing for discounts on individual properties because many require updating" is the real kicker. The suburban real estate market is depressed.

I also practice real estate law. Unfortunately, the "fair market value" of World War II era structures lacking a CO and a decent road isn't much. The cost to the communities in law enforcement and downward pressure on property values, for vacant structures which are what is legally known as an "attractive nuisance", is another issue. Neighbors are worried about the personal safety of their families, as hundreds of acres of buildings sit empty, vacant.

In short, these buildings need to be sold ASAP to developers, with performance bonds to guarantee that they no longer sit empty and are put to active use. Reality needs to be faced, and that means that "fair market value" is but a fraction of what could have been garnered prior to the mortgage crisis. That's not a "discount." That's the reality in the real estate market which my clients face daily.

Reply

Fred M

5:05 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012

People need to see Something happening...Sight of redeveloping starting, construction beginning goes a long way..Let something happen.. Personly, I would love to see Technology invocations here...Fort Monmouth in its day was The Technology leader in many ways...This type of business would be beautiful...Technology and Ft Monmouth are perfect fit..

Reply

Barney

1:07 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012

Fred M from Shrewsbury,

Maybe you should be a little more interested in having your house reassessed.

It doesn't seem to be worth the $19k in taxes you said you pay.

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Red Bank-Shrewsbury Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks