one is an American at heart and one is not . . . . . . Watch 2016: Obama's America playing at Loews Theater in Toms River. You WILL see the difference.

Your post is full of lies . . . . where did you cut and past this garbage from?

Both of these so called candidates are TOTAL FRAUDS, puppets placed by the globalist groups such as Bilderberg, CFR and Bohemian Grove- which both Obama, Romney and many other past presidential puppets were members of. Our country is toast unless people start waking up. Romney is just as unamerican as obama

People are going to tell you that you're wrong. Kind of like how they all said Ron Paul was crazy when he was making these predictions about the nation's future if we didn't make any changes ... all of which ultimately turned out to be right on the money. There's just a lot of people who take a very lazy approach to elections and automatically assume that all they need to know about a candidate is their party affiliation. The Republican is pro-business, and the Democrat is a Socialist. The Democrat is for the middle class, and the Republican only cares about the rich. I wish people would wake up and realize that, while there are some people in elected office with decent intentions, most incumbents in both major parties are out solely for themselves and their top fundraisers. Obama & Romney, judging by their time in elected office (where they have repeatedly engaged in acts of crony capitalism, such as their respective health care laws), are two of the worst examples of this a person can find. And you wonder why so many voters choose to stay home on Election Day. We deserve better - MUCH better - than these two losers.

great hoax why go to the movies to see that when it will end up on dvd next to sara palin's book in the dollar bin in another month next to the rest of the right wing trash like rush limbaugh's fitness dvd?

You spent far too much time in your basement working up these so called facts; get out in the sun light and the fresh air your brain is getting moldy!

Wrong! This is starkest difference since Goldwater vs. LBJ. It's the radical right (the elite 1% who are millionaires, banksters, oil co. execs., hedge-funder speculators) vs. us (99%). Easy choice in November.

George: There are DEMOCRAT MILLIONAIRES than Republicans -- that is a FACT. Please don't go trying to represent Democrats are "friends" of the working people like myself.

Read the following: There are more millionaire Democratic senators (37) than Republicans (30). The median net worth of Senate Democrats was likewise higher: $2.69 million compared to $2.43 million. See the MSN article from this time last year at: http://money.msn.com/investing/latest.aspx?post=70cc8f98-07b4-4e4e-923e-5569bd82627d and the 15 richest members of Congress: http://money.msn.com/investing/the-15-richest-members-of-congress

No wonder the Democrats want to stop the ID requirement to cast ballots -- how else are they going to be able to perpetuate fraud like this on the American people?

George: Racist DEMOCRATS blocked national civil rights legislation. President Johnson got the necessary votes to pass the 1964 Civil Rights Act from REPUBLICANS.

Why are you so eager to lie about history when it's so easy to point out your obvious bias?

Romney and Obama are alike? It's like saying Good vs. Bad is the same. Go Romney!!!

John Jay dont waste your breath on LIEbal pinheads like george (sorros??) They drink the koolade by the gallon. I work/worked w/fools like him & no matter how much proof you show them they still wont believe the truth. just look at teh 9-11 conspiracy nuts, when you disprove one thier out landish conspiracys they change it to thier liking. just watch the video loose (screw) change when proven wrong they move the goalposts.

proudnot2bliberal: I won't back down lies pushed by Democrats. Have you ever seen a public school history book that states the following truth:

* Southern Demorats, led by Confederate Officer Nathan Bedford Forest, created the the Ku Klux Klan (KKK).

* The KKK/Democrats attacks and murdered thousands of free slaves. They attacked and murdered REPUBLICAN legislators trying to help free slaves.

* REPUBLICANS forged and passed the the 14th Amendment to the Constitution that ensured freed slaves and their children would be United States citizens.

* Under REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP, freed slaves and their children were able to work for the federal government and run for office. This progressive move thrived until Woodrow Wilson became President.

* RACIST DEMOCRAT Woodrow Wilson BANNED blacks from attending Princeton University while he was president there.

* RACIST DEMOCRAT Woodrow Wilson backed the BLUE PRINT for JIM CROW laws at the federal level. Upon being elected President of the U.S., RACIST DEMOCRAT Woodrow Wilson continued his hate campaign by passing orders that resulted in the mass firings of Blacks from the federal government.

...the campaign of hatred and terror against blacks was eased somewhat when Demoractic President Harry Truman desegregated the armed forces -- but it took REPUBLICANS to get the Civil Rights movement the support it needed to end the decades of Democrat hate campaigns.

The 2 party system is a fraud and both are bought and paid for by the offshore banking cartel. And yes, 9/11 was an inside job. It was a false-flag attack. Loose Change is a great, educational piece of truth

How does The Patch allow this guy (Uncle Moe) to pen an op-ed piece? Of course, everyone is entitled to their opinion, but has anyone read the comments this guy authors? Clearly, there's an agenda here at The Lacey Patch and unfortunately I'm not surprised. From the way they delete comments to the content they continue to publish, this is just another shining. Why give a platform to this kind of ridiculous, speculative anti-government crap? What does that say about The Patch? Sure, we're for freedom of speech, and that means every card carrying lunatic can write a piece, and we won't check facts or sources. Man, this is a shame.

Johnson: Bloggers do not work for Patch. The platform is open to anyone who's interested: http://lacey.patch.com/blog/apply

@mrvrnj421 If you read my comment, you'd see I said "Of course, everyone is entitled to their opinion...". To answer your question - The Patch is the judge of what content is acceptable. It says so in their Terms. They frequently censor comments that DO NOT violate what they have as unacceptable. My point is simply that just because someone has an opinion, and we live in America, does not give them the right to accuse elected officials in a public forum with baseless claims. If The Patch wants to get into the business of being the vehicle of the insane and the point of reference for conspiracy theories, fine. But where is the line drawn? Would you object to the anti-gay church who protests soldier's funerals being given a forum? Or how about they invite the KKK or some neo-Nazi's to write what's on their minds? Again, opinions , fine - everyone's got them - but do we need to publish every article written by someone with an internet connection?

I haven't read the comments you speak of, and perhaps that is a whole other matter. However, in regards to Patch allowing this blog to be posted, what in the content of this blog do you consider harmful? And to whom?

Obama and Romney Receive Invite from KKK http://kkk.bz/?p=3443

Read some of Uncle Moe's comments, not just in this article but others...you'll be surprised. I personally believe that allowing anyone to publish whatever they want is harmful to the Patch itself and to the no-educated reader believing what they are reading without checking the facts. It's harmful to the elected officials who are mentioned as well. Of course not physically, but to their campaigns and to their character.

@idiots Why do you idiots put the @ sign in front of people's names?

Usually the jarhead guy is a jabroni but his exchange with jersey devil is great.

Can you also agree that you both need to get a hobby?